Candidate Name

Elizabeth Riley

Which office are you seeking?

87th Assembly District

Campaign website and/or social media links
FB: Elizabeth Riley for Assembly

1. Do you support a legal, regulated, and taxed market for recreational cannabis, allowing Wisconsin residents over the age of 21 to purchase and possess up to two ounces (or more) of cannabis from regulated dispensaries, as proposed by State Rep. Melissa Sargent’s (D-Madison) AB482?


2. Do you support allowing any Wisconsin resident over the age of 21 to grow up to 6 (or more) cannabis plants at home without a license, as proposed by AB482?


3. Do you support allowing patients suffering from various ailments to purchase and use cannabis as treatment for their ailments if they have a doctor’s recommendation?


4. Do you agree with the qualifying conditions for medical cannabis outlined in Section 42 of AB482 (listed below)?
(2) "Debilitating medical condition or treatment" means any of the following:
(a) Cancer; glaucoma; acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; a positive test for the presence of HIV, antigen or nonantigenic products of HIV, or an antibody to HIV; Crohn's disease; a hepatitis C virus infection; Alzheimer's disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; nail patella syndrome; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; post-traumatic stress disorder; or the treatment of these conditions.
(b) A chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition or the treatment of such a disease or condition that causes cachexia, severe pain, severe nausea, seizures, including those characteristic of epilepsy, or severe and persistent muscle spasms, including those characteristic of multiple sclerosis.
(c) Any other medical condition or any other treatment for a medical condition designated as a debilitating medical condition or treatment in rules promulgated by the department of health services under s. 50.81 (2).


5. Answer this question only if you support both recreational and medicinal uses of cannabis. Do you support allowing medical cannabis patients to possess more cannabis than recreational users and to be exempt from the taxes that are imposed on recreational users?


6. Do you support a permitting system that would enable publicly-accessible establishments to allow legal possessors of cannabis to smoke it in outdoor areas at their establishments? This would address an issue present in other states’ implementations, where many people are legally allowed to purchase and possess cannabis, but have no place to legally consume it.

Yes. It works in Colorado. It should work here. Tight regulation on dispensaries and places to consume have resulted in huge revenues. Just as we don’t have people walking up and down our streets swigging openly from whiskey bottles, instead having places for people go if they don’t wish to consume in their homes, we can do with marijuana.

7. Do you support conviction expungement or pardons for anyone convicted of possession, growing, and/or selling cannabis in Wisconsin?

Mostly. Those people who grow large operations in our shared state forests and damage those forests need to be accountable for that. But the thousands of people in prisons for non-violent drug convictions need to have their records expunged.

8. Do you support or would you consider any other cannabis regulatory or legalization scheme for Wisconsin

I do not know how to answer this. I support Representative Sargent’s plan. I have long believed we should leagalize it, regulate it, and tax it.

9. Do you believe that possession of limited amounts of cannabis by a person in his or her own home or in another’s home with the owner’s permission should be legal in the State of Wisconsin?


10. What level of taxes do you think should be imposed on recreational cannabis?

I do not know enough to answer this question.

11. How do you think that tax revenue should be used?

Education and health care.

12. Why is cannabis law reform an important issue to you?

Because Wisconsin has one of the highest incarceration rates in the country. Taking the crime out of marijuana use saves millions of dollars, both in lower costs for lower prison populations, and for the good of thousands of families which have been torn apart by non-violent drug use convictions and long prison sentences. This is long overdue.

Additional Comments

[No response]