Red Arnold

Candidate Name

Red Arnold

Which office are you seeking?

State Senate District 7

Campaign website and/or social media links

voteredarnold.com

1. Do you support a legal, regulated, and taxed market for recreational cannabis, allowing Wisconsin residents over the age of 21 to purchase and possess up to two ounces (or more) of cannabis from regulated dispensaries, as proposed by State Rep. Melissa Sargent’s (D-Madison) AB482?

Yes

2. Do you support allowing any Wisconsin resident over the age of 21 to grow up to 6 (or more) cannabis plants at home without a license, as proposed by AB482?

For personal use vs retail sale? Yes

3. Do you support allowing patients suffering from various ailments to purchase and use cannabis as treatment for their ailments if they have a doctor’s recommendation?

Yes

4. Do you agree with the qualifying conditions for medical cannabis outlined in Section 42 of AB482 (listed below)?
(2) "Debilitating medical condition or treatment" means any of the following:
(a) Cancer; glaucoma; acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; a positive test for the presence of HIV, antigen or nonantigenic products of HIV, or an antibody to HIV; Crohn's disease; a hepatitis C virus infection; Alzheimer's disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; nail patella syndrome; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; post-traumatic stress disorder; or the treatment of these conditions.
(b) A chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition or the treatment of such a disease or condition that causes cachexia, severe pain, severe nausea, seizures, including those characteristic of epilepsy, or severe and persistent muscle spasms, including those characteristic of multiple sclerosis.
(c) Any other medical condition or any other treatment for a medical condition designated as a debilitating medical condition or treatment in rules promulgated by the department of health services under s. 50.81 (2).

Yes

5. Answer this question only if you support both recreational and medicinal uses of cannabis. Do you support allowing medical cannabis patients to possess more cannabis than recreational users and to be exempt from the taxes that are imposed on recreational users?

With medical cannabis being billed through insurance, I take it? Sure

6. Do you support a permitting system that would enable publicly-accessible establishments to allow legal possessors of cannabis to smoke it in outdoor areas at their establishments? This would address an issue present in other states’ implementations, where many people are legally allowed to purchase and possess cannabis, but have no place to legally consume it.

What about transportation to said locations? But aside from home, or if it’s only medical, why would you need such a place? Just like firearms, if it’s public or with the owner’s consent, it should be fine. “Hash bars” might be a tough sell. Is this the question’s intended target?

7. Do you support conviction expungement or pardons for anyone convicted of possession, growing, and/or selling cannabis in Wisconsin?

Yes

8. Do you support or would you consider any other cannabis regulatory or legalization scheme for Wisconsin

Sure

9. Do you believe that possession of limited amounts of cannabis by a person in his or her own home or in another’s home with the owner’s permission should be legal in the State of Wisconsin?

Yes

10. What level of taxes do you think should be imposed on recreational cannabis?

Depends. I’m always for lower taxes but recreational sources should usually be taxed higher.

11. How do you think that tax revenue should be used?

1st. Opioid/drug treatment center needs. 2nd. DOT budget holes ONCE the DOT is FINALLY whipped into shape.

12. Why is cannabis law reform an important issue to you?

1. It’s a Freedom issue 2. Its non lethal 3. Its medically helpful 4. Illegal marijuana simply gives the government more control over our lives and freedoms 5. It can help expand the understanding of consciousness 6. Let’s face it… the giggles & the munchies feckin’ rule. ☺️

Additional Comments

These answers or rather concise on the subject that is heavily debated. Don’t take these truncated answers as gospel for an argument when a simple phone call can easily clarify any unanswered material.